Real Estate Exam by State

National portion · disclosures and environmental

Lead-based paint, and what else must be disclosed

Lead-based paint disclosure applies to housing built before 1978: before the contract, the seller or landlord hands over the federal pamphlet and any known lead information, and a buyer gets a 10-day chance to test. Disclosures and environmental issues are 9 of the 80 scored Pearson VUE questions and 7% of the PSI national portion.

Updated Oct 24, 2026 · Not affiliated with any state commission or test provider.

  • 9of 80 scored, Pearson VUE
  • 7%of the PSI national portion
  • 15questions on this page

The lead-based paint rule

The federal rule (EPA summary) covers the sale and lease of most housing built before 1978. Before the buyer or tenant is bound, the seller or landlord must:

  1. Give the EPA pamphlet Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home.
  2. Disclose any known lead-based paint or hazards and hand over available records and reports.
  3. Include the Lead Warning Statement and the signed disclosure in the contract or lease.
  4. Give a buyer a 10-day opportunity to have a risk assessment or inspection, which the buyer may change or waive in writing.

Nobody is required to test or remove the paint. The seller’s or landlord’s agents, and a buyer’s agent paid through the seller, must make sure the steps happen; the signed forms are kept for three years. Leases of 100 days or less, zero-bedroom units, and housing for older persons or people with disabilities (unless a child under 6 lives there) are among the exemptions.

What the area covers

Pearson VUE area VI and PSI area VII test the same two halves:

  • Hazards: lead-based paint, asbestos, radon, mold, groundwater contamination, underground storage tanks, waste sites and brownfields, flood zones and flood insurance.
  • Federal law: the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts, the EPA, CERCLA and SARA, environmental site assessments, wetlands.
  • Disclosure duties: the seller’s property condition disclosure, material facts and material defects, conditions that call for an inspection or a survey, and liability for failing to disclose.

15 disclosure questions

0 of 15 answered · 0 correct
Question 1 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

While touring a property, a buyer's agent notices an old, unmapped pipe protruding from the ground near the driveway. What is the MOST appropriate action for the agent to take to fulfill their fiduciary duties?

Answer and explanations

Correct: A pipe sticking out of the ground can be a fill or vent pipe for a buried tank, so the agent tells the buyer to get a specialized inspection and makes the offer contingent on it.

Incorrect: Digging up the yard is outside an agent's role and could cause damage or liability.

Incorrect: A visible warning sign cannot be ignored just because the seller did not mention it.

Incorrect: The EPA does not open investigations on request for a pipe in a yard; the buyer needs an inspection first.

Incorrect: A standard home inspection does not include locating buried tanks.

Question 2 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A seller paints over severe water stains and structural cracks in the ceiling before listing the property "as is." The buyer purchases the home without an inspection and later discovers the severe damage. Does the "as is" clause protect the seller from liability?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: "As is" clauses are valid in residential sales too; the problem is the fraud.

Incorrect: "As is" shifts the risk of unknown defects, not of defects the seller concealed.

Incorrect: The seller's liability comes from concealment, not from any guarantee of structural soundness.

Correct: An "as is" clause does not protect a seller who actively hid defects, such as painting over stains and cracks.

Incorrect: Skipping an inspection does not excuse the seller's concealment.

Question 3 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A buyer and seller agree to the sale of a home built in 1972. The seller provides the EPA-approved lead hazard pamphlet and verbally warns the buyer about potential lead paint. What additional element is required to make the contract fully compliant with federal law?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: The rule does not make the seller assume liability for health effects.

Incorrect: Sellers do not have to abate lead or certify its removal.

Correct: Federal rules require the sales contract to include the Lead Warning Statement and the buyer's signed acknowledgment of the disclosures and pamphlet.

Incorrect: The buyer gets an opportunity to test, which can be waived in writing; the buyer is not required to test.

Incorrect: The rule lets the buyer waive the inspection opportunity, but it does not involve waiving a right to cancel.

Question 4 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A buyer of a 1970 property demands that the seller conduct a lead-based paint test before closing. Under the federal lead disclosure rule, what is the seller legally required to do?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: The rule does not require the seller to remove lead hazards.

Incorrect: A risk assessment is the buyer's option, not a seller duty.

Incorrect: Hiring inspectors is not a seller obligation under the disclosure rule.

Incorrect: The seller does not have to test, even at the buyer's request; the buyer can arrange testing.

Correct: The federal lead rule requires the seller to disclose what is known and hand over existing reports, not to perform new tests.

Question 5 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A seller completes a property disclosure form indicating no known underground storage tanks. However, the listing agent possesses an old survey clearly showing an abandoned tank. What is the agent's responsibility?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: Loyalty to the seller does not permit concealing a material fact.

Incorrect: An agent cannot hide behind a seller form the agent knows is wrong.

Incorrect: Altering the seller's form would be fraud.

Correct: An agent who knows of a buried tank must disclose it, even if the seller's form says there is none.

Incorrect: Removing the tank is a matter for the seller and buyer to negotiate; the agent's duty is disclosure.

Question 6 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

An investor is selling a single-family home built in 1975. The property was completely gutted and rebuilt in 2010. The seller insists that all original materials were removed and refuses to provide a lead-based paint disclosure. Is this legally permissible?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: The construction date, not the renovation date, sets whether the rule applies.

Incorrect: The federal rule covers housing built before 1978, not all homes.

Incorrect: The rule has no exemption for structural overhauls.

Correct: The federal lead rule depends on the year of construction; renovation does not exempt a pre-1978 home unless a certified inspector finds it lead-free.

Incorrect: Renovation records are not the exemption; only a certified inspection finding no lead-based paint is.

Question 7 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A listing agent discovers an unrecorded boundary fence encroachment and a known history of extensive indoor mold. How must the agent treat these two very different property issues during the transaction?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: Mold history is just as material as the encroachment.

Incorrect: Mold is a property condition, not a confidential matter of the seller.

Correct: A boundary encroachment and a history of extensive mold are both material facts the agent must disclose.

Incorrect: Disclosure of known material facts does not wait for the buyer to inspect.

Incorrect: Telling the title company does not inform the buyer, and the mold cannot be ignored.

Question 8 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A property floods every spring, but the current FEMA map shows Zone X. The seller marks 'no flood risk' on the disclosure. Is this correct?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: Known flooding must be disclosed whether or not the buyer asks.

Correct: A seller who knows the property floods every spring must disclose it, whatever the FEMA map says.

Incorrect: The map does not override the seller's own knowledge of repeated flooding.

Incorrect: Zone X means moderate or minimal mapped risk, not no flooding at all.

Incorrect: Having flood insurance does not cancel the duty to disclose known flooding.

Question 9 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

While touring a property, a real estate licensee notices a radon mitigation pipe running up the side of the house, but the system's fan is unplugged. The seller states the system hasn't been used in years. What is the licensee's disclosure obligation?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: An installed system says nothing about current radon levels; telling the buyer the home is radon-free is false.

Incorrect: Disclosure of a known material fact does not depend on the buyer's contingencies.

Incorrect: The licensee cannot condition disclosure on the seller repairing the system.

Incorrect: An inactive system still signals a past radon issue, so it belongs on the disclosure.

Correct: A radon mitigation system shows a known prior radon concern, which is material and should be disclosed even if the fan is off.

Question 10 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A buyer moving across state lines insists that federal law mandates the seller to test the property for radon and remediate any levels above 4.0 pCi/L before closing. Which statement represents the most accurate evaluation of this claim?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: No federal rule ties radon testing to private mortgages.

Incorrect: The EPA advises action at 4.0 pCi/L, but there is no federal remediation mandate for sales.

Incorrect: There is no federal mandate for sellers to test.

Correct: The EPA recommends testing and sets 4.0 pCi/L as an action level, but federal law does not require sellers to test or fix radon.

Incorrect: No federal rule requires radon to be zero before a sale.

Question 11 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A buyer of a 1968 residence orally agrees to waive the ten-day lead-based paint inspection period to expedite closing. Which statement accurately describes the legality of this waiver under federal regulations?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: The rule allows the waiver, as long as it is written.

Incorrect: Recording the waiver is not a requirement; a written waiver is.

Incorrect: Broker witnesses do not make an oral waiver valid.

Incorrect: Mutual consent is not enough; the waiver must be in writing.

Correct: Under the federal lead rule the buyer can give up the 10-day inspection opportunity, but only in writing.

Question 12 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

A residential property is located immediately adjacent to a newly zoned commercial chemical manufacturing plant. Although not physically on the property, how should the listing agent handle this information?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: Lowering the price instead of disclosing still hides a material fact.

Incorrect: Off-site conditions can be material when they affect the property's value or use.

Incorrect: Reporting to agencies does not inform buyers, which is the agent's duty.

Incorrect: Disclosure of material facts does not wait for a written inquiry.

Correct: A chemical plant next door can affect value and desirability, so it is a material fact to disclose even though it is off site.

Question 13 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

During a property viewing, a prospective buyer expresses concern about a large, jagged crack in the basement wall. The buyer's agent confidently assures them that the crack is strictly cosmetic settling and does not require an engineer. The agent is:

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: Calming a buyer with an unqualified opinion is not a fiduciary service.

Correct: Calling a large jagged crack cosmetic is a structural opinion the agent is not qualified to give; the agent should recommend an engineer or inspector.

Incorrect: A foundation crack is a structural issue, not an environmental-hazard disclosure rule.

Incorrect: An agent's visual look is not a professional structural assessment.

Incorrect: A seller's oral assurance does not make the agent's guarantee appropriate.

Question 14 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

Knowing that a subsurface French drain frequently fails and floods the basement, a seller applies waterproof paint over severe water stains right before listing the property. The seller does not disclose the flooding. This situation represents an attempt to conceal a:

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: Functional obsolescence is an appraisal concept for outdated design, not a hidden water problem.

Incorrect: The paint is meant to stop the defect from being seen, so it is not a patent defect.

Incorrect: Constructive notice concerns recorded documents, not hidden physical defects.

Incorrect: A flooding basement is a physical defect, not a title encumbrance.

Correct: Painting over water stains hides a defect that ordinary inspection would not reveal, which makes it a latent defect.

Question 15 of 15 · Disclosures and environmental issues · 9 items

An FHA-insured lender requires flood insurance for a home in an AE flood zone. The agent tells the buyer federal law never requires flood insurance for single-family homes. Is the agent correct?

Answer and explanations

Incorrect: The requirement covers the whole Special Flood Hazard Area, the 1% annual-chance floodplain, not only the floodway.

Incorrect: Flood insurance is required in mapped high-risk zones for federally backed loans; it is not optional everywhere.

Incorrect: FHA loans on homes in a Special Flood Hazard Area must carry flood insurance.

Correct: Federally regulated and federally insured lenders must require flood insurance on buildings in a Special Flood Hazard Area, such as zone AE.

Incorrect: The requirement covers residential buildings, including single-family homes, not only commercial ones.

Answer every question to see your score

Material facts and latent defects

A material fact is one that would change a reasonable buyer’s decision or price. A latent defect is hidden, one an ordinary inspection would not find; a patent defect is visible. Sellers must disclose known latent defects, and a licensee who knows of one must disclose it even when the seller’s form says otherwise. “As is” shifts the risk of unknown conditions to the buyer, but it does not protect a seller who concealed a known defect. When a licensee sees a red flag, such as stains, a crack or an old pipe in the yard, the answer is to disclose it and recommend an expert, not to give a technical opinion. Disclosure forms and the rules on stigmatized property are state law; Arizona agency and licensee duties is one state example.

Federal law advises on radon, it does not order a test

The EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L of radon or more (EPA), but no federal law requires a seller to test for radon or mold before a sale. Known test results and mitigation systems are material facts and are disclosed. Asbestos is a hazard mainly when friable or disturbed; encapsulation is often the remedy.

Flood zones and Superfund

Special Flood Hazard Areas on FEMA’s maps (FEMA flood maps) are zones with a 1% annual chance of flooding, labeled A or V; a loan from a federally regulated or insured lender on a building there requires flood insurance. A low-risk map zone does not excuse a seller from disclosing a known flood history.

Under CERCLA (Superfund), current and past owners can be liable for cleanup regardless of fault, jointly and severally and retroactively; SARA added the innocent landowner defense, which depends on an environmental site assessment before purchase (Phase I reviews records and the site, Phase II samples soil and water).

The Florida broker exam points its environmental issues area here as well: 1% of that exam.

Other national sections

Disclosures, quick answers

Which homes need a lead-based paint disclosure?

Most housing built before 1978, for both sales and leases. Exemptions include leases of 100 days or less and zero-bedroom units.

Does a seller have to test for lead paint?

No. The seller discloses what is known, provides records and the pamphlet, and gives a buyer the chance to test; testing and removal are not required.

How many national questions are on disclosures?

Pearson VUE: 9 of 80 scored questions. PSI: 7% of the national portion.